Article | European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults | The ‘digital curious’: first steps towards a new typology for mapping adults’ relationships with others when using ICT

Title:
The ‘digital curious’: first steps towards a new typology for mapping adults’ relationships with others when using ICT
Author:
Rita Bencivenga: Laboratoire détudes de genre et de sexualité, France
DOI:
10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9117
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Year:
2017
Volume:
8
Issue:
1
Pages:
55-76
No. of pages:
22
Publication type:
Article
Published:
2017-02-10


The study described in this article used grounded theory methodology to investigate adults’ accounts of their relationships with others when using information and communication technologies (ICT). Ten women and ten men were interviewed. All were Italians born between 1952-1961. It was found that the participants shared a common eagerness to learn and use ICT, which led us to coin the term ‘digital curious’. They recognised the growing importance of using ICT and realised that they were competent enough to support others in ICT learning or use. Their awareness of their competence and role was linked to their approach to interactions with older and younger people, not all of them easy. The study findings illustrate how the participants’ relationships with older and younger people when using ICT are seen as relevant and offer meaningful experiences. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are also discussed.

Keywords: Adults; digital natives; analog natives; ICT; usage

Volume 8, Issue: 1, Article 4, 2017

Author:
Rita Bencivenga
Title:
The ‘digital curious’: first steps towards a new typology for mapping adults’ relationships with others when using ICT:
DOI:
10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9117
References:

Aarsand, L. (2014). Parental self-work: Governing enactments in family life. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 5(1), 67–80. DOI: 10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9025

Allario, M. (2003). I" nuovi anziani": interessi e aspettative. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Anderson, E. M., & Shannon, A. L. (1988). Toward a Conceptualization of Mentoring. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 38–42. DOI: 10.1177/002248718803900109

Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322, 1115-1117. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115

Bailey, A., Ngwenyama, O. (2010). Bridging the Generation Gap in ICT Use: Interrogating Identity, Technology and Interactions in Community Telecenters. Information Technology for Development, 16(1), 62-82. DOI: 10.1080/02681100903566156

Bencivenga, R. (2014). Femmes et Hommes Devant Lordinateur:Histoires du développement d’une relation positive. Paris: L’Harmattan.

Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x

Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Berk, L. E. (2006). Child Development. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Carr, D., Pudrovska T. (1996). Mid-Life and Later-Life Crises. In Encyclopedia of gerontology (pp. 175-185). ScienceDirect.org; Elsevier.

Carlson, R.A. & Sohn, M-H. (2000). Cognitive control of multiple-step routines: Information processing and conscious intentions. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.) Control of cognitive processes: Attention and Performance XVIII. (pp. 443-464). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Charmaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.

Clark, F., Fochs Heller, A., Rafman, C., & Walker, J. (1997). Peer learning: a popular model for seniors education. Educational Gerontology, 2(8), 751–762. DOI: 10.1080/0360127970230801

Colley, H. (2002). A “rough guide” to the history of mentoring from a Marxist feminist perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 28(3), 247–263. DOI: 10.1080/0260747022000021403

Dyck, J. L., & Smither, J. a a. (1996). Older adults’ acquisition of word processing: The contribution of cognitive abilities and computer anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(1), 107–119. DOI: 10.1016/0747-5632(95)00022-4

European Commission. The Education, Audiovisual & Culture Executive Agency [EC EACEA]. (2012).

ICT for seniors’ and intergenerational learning. Retrieved July 27, 2016, from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/llp/results_projects/documents/publi/ict_intergenerational_learning.pdf.

ENIL_European Network for Intergenerational Learning (2013). Report on intergenerational learningand volunteering. Hull: ENIL.

Facchini, C., & Rampazi, M. (2006). Generazioni anziane tra vecchie e nuove incertezze. Rassegna italiana di sociologia, 47(1), 61-90.

Farris, M., Bates, R., Resnick, H., & Stabler, N. (1994). Evaluation of computer games’ impact upon cognitively impaired frail elderly. Computers in Human Services, 11, 219–228.

Ferlander, S., & Timms, D. (2006). Bridging the dual digital divide: A local net and an IT-café in Sweden. Information, Communication & Society, 9(02), 137-159. DOI: 10.1080/13691180600630732

Ferri, P., Mantovani S. (2008). Digital kids. Come i bambini usano il computer e come potrebbero usarlo genitori e insegnanti. Milano: Etas-Fondazione IBM.

Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2004). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/9781420023862

Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (2000). The new aging: self construction and social values. In K.W. Schaie (Ed.), Social structures and aging (pp. 281-306). New York: Springer.

Glaser, B.G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-45. DOI: 10.2307/798843

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine Publications.

Glen, N. D. (2005). Cohort analysis: Quantitative applications in the social sciences) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781412983662

Gui, M., & Argentin, G. (2011). Digital skills of Internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media & Society, 13(6), 963-980. DOI: 10.1177/1461444810389751

Harris, M. (2014). The end of absence. New York: Current.

Istat. (2014). Cittadini e nuove tecnologie. Statistiche e Report. Retrieved from http://www.istat.it/salastampa/comunicati/non_calendario/20091228_01/

Jay, G. M., & Willis, S. L. (1996). Influence of Direct Computer Experience on Older Adults’ Attitudes Toward Computers. Journal of Gerontology, 47(4), 250–257. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/47.4.P250

Jones, C., & Shao, B. (2011). The net generation and digital natives: implications for higher education. York: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/evidencenet/net-generation-and-digital-natives

Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. L. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives. Australasian journal of educational technology, 24(1), 108-122. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1233

Kvasny, L. (2006). Cultural (re)production of digital inequality in a US community technology initiative. Information, Communication & Society, 9(2), 160-181. DOI: 10.1080/13691180600630740

Kvavik, R. B., Caruso J.B., & Morgan G. (2004). ECAR Study of Students and Information Technology, 2004: Convenience, Connection, and Control. Boulder, Colorado: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. Retreived June 12, 2015 from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ers0405/rs/ers0405w.pdf.

Lawhon, T., Ennis, D., & Lawhon, D. C. (1996). Senior adults and computers in the 1990s. EducationalGerontology: An International Quarterly, 22(2), 193-201. DOI: 10.1080/0360127960220205

Lin, C. I. C., Tang, W., & Kuo, F.-Y. (2012). “Mommy Wants to Learn the Computer”:How Middle Aged and Elderly Women in Taiwan Learn ICT Through Social Support. Adult Education Quarterly, 62(1), 73–90. DOI: 10.1177/0741713610392760

Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Assessing quality in qualitative research. Bmj, 320(7226), 50–52. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50

McGuire, F. A., Boyd, R. K., & Tedrick, R. (1999). Leisure and aging. Ulyssean living in later life. Champaing, IL: Sagamore Publishing.

Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family Relations and the Internet: Exploring a Family Boundaries Approach. The Journal of Family Location. 6(2):119-138. DOI: 10.1207/s15327698jfc0602_2

Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006). The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 25–35.

Morris, J. M. (1994). Computer training needs of older adults. Educational Gerontology, 20, 541–555. DOI: 10.1080/0360127940200601

Moss, G., Wulf, C. & Mullen, H. (2013). Internet marketing to 50+ generations in the. UK and France. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 25(1), 45–58. DOI: 10.1080/08961530.2013.751799

Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Educating the Net Generation. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf.

Oliver, B., & Goerke, V.(2007). Australian undergraduates use and ownership of emerging technologies:Implications and opportunities for creating engaging learning experiences for the Net Generation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 171-186. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1263

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron? Quality and Quantity, 41(2), 233–249. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-006-9000-3

Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.

Pedró, F. (2007). The New Millennium Learners: Challenging our Views on Digital Technologies and Learning. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 2(4), 244-264.

Porcu, S. (2006). Proceedings from Convegno Kinder.Kom: La terza età di Internet. Trasformazioni dell’invecchiamento e nuove reti di comunicazione e informazione. Kinder.Kom: Bologna

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. DOI: 10.1108/10748120110424816

Prensky, M. (2012). From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom: Hopeful Essays for 21st Century Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. DOI: 10.4135/9781483387765

Ranieri, M. (2011). Le insidie dell’ovvio. Tecnologie educative e critica della retorica tecno centrica. Pisa: ETS.

Ribak, R. (2001). Like Immigrants Negotiating Power in the Face of the Home Computer. New media & society, 3(2), 220-238. DOI: 10.1177/14614440122226065

Roebuck, J. (1979). When does old age begin?: The evolution of the English definition. Journal of Social History, 12(3), 416–428. DOI: 10.1353/jsh/12.3.416

Roman, R., & Colle, R. D. (2002). Themes and issues in telecentre sustainability, 10, University of Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management.

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Ryan, E. B., Szechtman, B., & Bodkin, J. (1992). Attitudes toward younger and older adults learning to use computers. Journal of Gerontology, 47(2), 96-101. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/47.2.P96

Schneider, B.A., & Pichora-Fuller, M.K. (2000). Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research. In F.I.M. Craik & T.A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp.107-123). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998a). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing Grounded Theory (2 ed). California: Sage

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998b). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Simmons, O. (2011). Why classic grounded theory. In V. Martin & A. Gynnild (Eds.), Grounded theory: The philosophy, method, and work of Barney Glaser. (pp. 15- 30). Boca Raton, FL: BrownWalker Press.

Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw Hill.

Tatnall, A. (2014). ICT, education and older people in Australia: A socio-technical analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 19, 549–564. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-013-9300-x

Tramma, S. (2003). I nuovi anziani. Roma: Meltemi Editore

Trocchia, P. J., & Janda, S. (2000). A phenomenological investigation of Internet usage among older individuals. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(7), 605–616. DOI: 10.1108/07363760010357804

Vaiciuniene, V. (2012). Social Media in Adult Education : Insights Gained From Grundtvig Learning Partnership Project, Institutional Strategies Targeting the Uptake of Social Networking in Adult Education ( Istus ), Social Technologies, 2(2), 473–482.

Valentine, G., Holloway, S., & Bingham, N. (2002). The digital generation?: Children, ICT and the everyday nature of social exclusion. Antipode, 34(2), 296-315. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.00239

Weisman, S. (1983). Computer games for the frail elderly. Gerontologist, 23, 361–363. DOI: 10.1093/geront/23.4.361

White, D. S., & Le Cornu, A. (2011). Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday, 16(9) Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3171/3049 DOI: 10.5210/fm.v16i9.3171

Volume 8, Issue: 1, Article 4, 2017

Author:
Rita Bencivenga
Title:
The ‘digital curious’: first steps towards a new typology for mapping adults’ relationships with others when using ICT:
DOI:
10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9117
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment
Export in BibTex, RIS or text