Article | European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults | A sociomaterial model of the teaching-learning continuum

A sociomaterial model of the teaching-learning continuum
Reinhard Zürcher: University of Teacher Education, Austria
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
No. of pages:
Publication type:

It is widely accepted today that the range between informal and formal learning can be conceptualized as a continuum. Since substantial models are not available, the specific features of this continuum depend on one’s preference. In this paper, I will propose a model for the continuum that defines its constituting variable ‘formalization’ and thereby its points and ends. Because the parameters of the learning process can reach different degrees of formalization, the continuum is split into sub-continua for each parameter. In a second step, the perspective on learning is expanded to the general teaching-learning process, with the consequence of complementing the learning continuum with a teaching continuum. In order to argue for entangled teachinglearning states and to address questions of materiality and causality, I draw on sociomaterial theories. Finally, some consequences for (adult) education research are discussed.

Keywords: informal learning; informal teaching; teaching-learning continuum; sociomaterial theories; (adult) education research

Volume 6, Issue: 1, Article 6, 2015

Reinhard Zürcher
A sociomaterial model of the teaching-learning continuum:
  • Alhadeff-Jones, M. (2013). Complexity, Methodology and Method: Crafting a Critical Process of Research. Complicity – An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 10(1/2), 19-44.
  • Beckett, D., & Hager, P. J. (2002). Life, Work and Learning: Practice in Postmodernity. London: Routledge.
  • Colley, H., Hodkinson, P., & Malcolm, J. (2003). Informality and formality in learning: a report for the Learning and Skills Research Centre. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
  • Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-Direction for Lifelong Learning. A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Commission of the European Union (2001). Making a European Area of Lifelong Learning a Reality. Brussels, 21. 11.
  • Dean, B., Sykes, C., & Turbill, J. (2012). So, what did you do? A performative, practice-based approach to examining informal learning in WIL (pp. 1-13). Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Cooperative and Work-Integrated Education of the World Association for Cooperative Education, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul.
  • Dewey, J. (1899/1966). Lectures in the Philosophy of Education. New York: Random House.
  • Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the Known. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Edwards, R. (2009). Introduction: Life as a learning context? In R. Edwards, G. Biesta, & M. Thorpe (Eds.), Rethinking Contexts for Learning and Teaching. Communities, Activities and Networks (pp. 1-13). New York: Routledge. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238859.003.0001
  • Fenwick, T. (2010a). Re-thinking the “thing”: Sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning in work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1/2), 104-116. doi: 10.1108/13665621011012898
  • Fenwick, T. (2010b). Workplace ‘learning’ and adult education. Messy objects, blurry maps and making difference. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 1(1/2), 79-95. doi: 10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0006
  • Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2013). Performative ontologies. Sociomaterial approaches to researching adult education and lifelong learning. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 4(1), 49-63. doi: 10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0104
  • Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. (1830). Wilhelm Meisters Wanderjahre oder die Entsagenden. Goethe’s Werke, Dreyundzwanzigster Band, Aus Makariens Archiv. Stuttgart und Tübingen: J. G. Cotta’sche Buchhandlung
  • Greeno, J. G. (1994). Gibson’s Affordances. Psychological Review, 101(2), 236-342. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.336
  • Haggis, T. (2008). Knowledge must be contextual: exploring some possible implications of complexity and dynamic systems theories for educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 159-176. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00403.x
  • Hetherington, L. (2013). Complexity Thinking and Methodology: the Potential of ‘Complex Case Study’ for Educational Research. Complicity: an International Journal of Complexity Theory and Education, 10(1/2), 71-85.
  • Jörg, T. (2009). Thinking in Complexity about Learning and Education: A Programmatic View. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 6(1), 1-22.
  • Kincheloe, J. L. (2001). Describing the Bricolage: Conceptualizing a New Rigor in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 679-692. doi: 10.1177/107780040100700601
  • Kincheloe, J. L. (2005). On to the Next Level: Continuing the Conceptualization of the Bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 323-350. doi: 10.1177/1077800405275056
  • Latour, B. (2005). Re-assembling the Social - An Introduction to Actor Network Theory. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Livingstone, D. W. (2001). Adult’s Informal Learning: Definitions, Findings, Gaps and Future Research. NALL Working Paper No. 21.Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
  • Lorino, P. (2013). Transaction and Transformation: A Pragmatist Perspective on Learning as Transforming Action and Transacting Forms. Paper presented at the International Conference on Organizational Learning, Knowledge and Capabilities, The George Washington University, 25 – 27 April.
  • Nomiku, I., Pitsch, K., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2013). Asymmetry and adaptation in social interaction (Editorial). Interaction Studies, Special Issue, 14(2), VII-XII. doi: 10.1075/is.14.2.001nom
  • Oreshkov, O., Costa, F., & Brukner, C. (2012). Quantum correlations with no causal order. Nature Communications 3, Article Number 1092. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2076
  • Phelps, R., & Hase, S. (2002). Complexity and action research: exploring the theoretical and methodological connection. Educational Action Research, 10(3), 507-524. doi: 10.1080/09650790200200198
  • Phelps, R., & Graham, A. (2010). Exploring the complementarities between complexity and action research: the story of Technology Together. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(2), 183-197. doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2010.481259
  • Rogers, A. (2004). ‘Looking again at non-formal and informal education – towards a new paradigm’. The encyclopaedia of informal education. London: YMCA George Williams College.
  • Rohs, M. (2007). Zur Theorie formellen und informellen Lernens in der IT-Weiterbildung. Dissertation, University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Hamburg.
  • Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1973). Cognitive consequences of formal and informal education. Science, 182(4112), 553-559. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4112.553
  • Tsui, A. B. M., & Law, D. Y. K. (2007). Learning as boundary-crossing in school–university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8) 1289–1301. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.003
  • Willis, J., Davis, K., & Chaplin, S. (2013). Sociocultural affordances of online peer engagement. Journal of Learning Design, 6(1), 34-45.
  • Zürcher, Reinhard. (2010). Teaching-learning processes between informality and formalization. The encyclopaedia of informal education. London: YMCA George Williams College.

Volume 6, Issue: 1, Article 6, 2015

Reinhard Zürcher
A sociomaterial model of the teaching-learning continuum:
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
  • Wendy McMilla & Natalie Gordon (2016). Being and becoming a university teacher. Higher Education Research & Development, : 1. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2016.1236781
  • Barry Hake (2016). Regulatory governance of 'training markets', 'market failure', and 'quasi' markets: historical dimensions of the post-initial training market in The Netherlands. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 7(2): 171. DOI: 10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9080
  • Export in BibTex, RIS or text