Article | European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults | Workplace ’learning’ and adult education: Messy objects, blurry maps and making difference

Title:
Workplace ’learning’ and adult education: Messy objects, blurry maps and making difference
Author:
Tara Fenwick: University of Stirling, Scotland
DOI:
10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0006
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Year:
2010
Volume:
1
Issue:
1-2
Pages:
79-95
No. of pages:
17
Publication type:
Article
Published:
2010-09-25


This article reviews diverse representations of learning evident among published accounts of workplace learning across fields such as adult education, human resource development, management and organisation studies. The discussion critically addresses the question of how to mediate a multiplicity of definitional, ideological and purposive orientations. The argument here is that the issue is not perspectival, but ontological. The critical problem lies in mistaking learning as a single object when in fact it is enacted as multiple objects, as very different things in different logics of study and practice. Particularly in the contested arena of work as a site of economic conflict and production, learning needs to be appreciated as a messy object, existing in different states, or perhaps a series of different objects that are patched together through some manufactured linkages.

Keywords: Workplace; learning theory; multiple ontologies

Volume 1, Issue: 1-2, Article 6, 2010

Author:
Tara Fenwick
Title:
Workplace ’learning’ and adult education: Messy objects, blurry maps and making difference
DOI:
10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0006
References:
  • Abma, T. A. (2003). Learning by telling. Management Learning, 34(2), 221-240.

    doi: 10.1177/1350507603034002004
  • Ball, S. (Ed.). (1990). Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. London: Routledge.
  • Bhaba, H. K. (1990). Nation and narration. London: Routledge.
  • Biesta, G.G. (2007). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Paradigm Publishers: Boulder, Colorado, US.
  • Billett, S. (2000). Guided learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 12(7), 272-285. doi: 10.1108/13665620010353351
  • Billett, S. (2004). Co-participation at work: Learning through work and throughout lives. Studies in the Education of Adults, 36(2), 190-205.
  • Bogenrieder, I. & Nooteboom, B. (2004). Learning groups: what types are there? A theoretical analysis and empirical study in a consultancy firm. Organization Studies, 25(2), 287-299. doi: 10.1177/0170840604040045
  • Boud, D. (2010). Relocating reflection in the context of practice. In H. Bradbury, N. Frost, S. Kilminster & M. Zukas (Eds.), Beyond reflective practice: New approaches to professional lifelong learning (pp. 25-36). London: Routledge.
  • Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (Eds.). (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.
  • Bradbury, H., Frost, N., Kilminster, S. & Zukas, M. (2010). Beyond reflective practice: New approaches to professional lifelong learning. London: Routledge.
  • Brady, T. & Davies, A. (2004). Building project capabilities: from exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1601-1614. doi: 1177/0170840604048002
  • Britzman, D.P. (2009). The very thought of education: Psychoanalysis and the impossible professions. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Cabrera, A. & Cabrera, E.F. (2002). Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies, 23(5), 687-701. doi: 10.1177/0170840602235001
  • Callahan, J.L. (2007).Gazing into the crystal ball: Critical HRD as a future of research in the field. Human Resource Development International, 10(1), 77-82. doi: 10.1080/13678860601170344
  • Cule, P. E. & Robey, D. (2004). A dual-motor, constructive process model of organizational transition. Organization Studies, 25(2), 229-240. doi: 10.1177/0170840604040037
  • Currie, G. & Kerrin, M. (2004). The limits of a technological fix to knowledge management: Epistemological, political and cultural issues in the case of intranet implementation. Management Learning, 35(1), 9-29. doi: 10.1177/1350507604042281
  • Daniels, H., Edwards, A., Engeström, Y., & Ludvigsen, S. (Eds.). (2009). Activity theory in practice: promoting learning across boundaries and agencies. London: Routledge.
  • Elkjaer, B. (2003). Organizational learning with a pragmatic slant. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(5), 481-494. doi: 10.1080/0260137032000102841
  • Fejes, A. & Nicoll, K. (Eds.). (2008). Foucault and lifelong learning: governing the subject. London: Routledge.
  • Fenwick, T. (2006). Tidying the territory: Questioning the terms and purposes in work-learning research. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(5), 265-278. doi: 10.1108/13665620610674953
  • Fenwick, T. (2008). Understanding relations of individual-collective learning in work: A review of research. Management Learning, 39(3), 227-243. doi: 10.1177/1350507608090875
  • Fenwick, T. & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. London: Routledge.
  • Fenwick, T. & Rubenson, K. (2005). Taking stock: a review of research in learning in work 1999-2004. Proceedings of the International Researching Work and Learning Conference. Sydney: University of Technology Sydney.
  • Filstad, C. (2004). How newcomers use role models in organizational socialization. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(7-8), 396-500. doi: 10.1108/13665620410558297
  • Fleetwood, S. (2005).Ontology in organization and management studies: A critical realist perspective. Organization, 12(2), 197-222. doi: 10.1177/1350508405051188
  • Fook, J. & Gardner, F. (2007). Practising critical reflection. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211-223. doi: 10.1177/135050840072001
  • Gherardi, S. (2009). Introduction: The critical power of the `practice lens. Management Learning, 40, 115-128. doi: 10.1177/1350507608101225
  • Hager, P. (2004). Lifelong learning in the workplace? Challenges and issues’. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(1-2), 22-33. doi: 10.1108/13665620410521486
  • Hamilton, M. (2009). Putting words in their mouths: the alignment of identities with system goals through the use of individual learning plans. British Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 221-242. doi: 10.1080/01411920802042739
  • Henare, A.J.M., Holbraad, M., & Wastell, S. (2006). Introduction: Thinking through Things. In A. J. M. Henare, M. Holbraad & S. Wastell, (Eds.), Thinking through things: theorising artefacts in ethnographically. London: Routledge.
  • Hitchin, L. & Maksymiw, W. (2009). STS in Management Education: Connecting Theory and Practice. Organization, 16(1), 57-80. doi: 10.1177/1350508408098922
  • Huzzard, T. (2004). Communities of domination? Reconceptualising organisational learning and power. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(5-6), 350-361. doi: 10.1108/13665620410550321
  • Jacobs R. L. & Washington, C. (2003). Employee development and organizational performance: a review of literature and directions for future research. Human Resource Development International, 6(3), 343-354. doi: 10.1080/13678860110096211
  • Jørgensen, C. H. (2004). Connecting work and education: Should learning be useful, correct or meaningful? Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(8), 455-465. doi: 10.1108/13665620410566423
  • Keegan, A. & Turner, J.R. (2001). Quantity versus quality in project-based learning practices. Management Learning, 32(1), 77-99. doi: 10.1177/1350507601321006
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (2007). Culture in global knowledge societies: Knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(4), 361-375. doi: 10.1179/030801807X163571
  • Lahn, L. & Jensen, K. (2007). Models of professional learning: Exploring the epistemic tool perspective. Knowledge, Work and Society, 4(3), 63-82.
  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
  • Law, J. (2009). Multiplicity, Mess, and Modes of Enacting. Paper presented to Objects - What Matters? Technology, Value and Social Change Conference, University of Manchester (September 3 2009).
  • Lehesvirta, T. (2004). Learning processes in a work organization: From individual to collective and/or vice versa? Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(1-2), 92-101. doi: 10.1108/13665620410521558
  • Livingstone, D. W. (2001). Worker control as the missing link: Relations between paid/unpaid work and work-related learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(7-8), 308-317. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000006121
  • Macpherson, A., Jones, O., Zhang, M., & Wilson, A. (2003). Re-conceptualising learning spaces: Developing capabilities in a high-tech small firm. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(6), 259-271. doi: 10.1108/13665620310488557
  • Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: a word and some questions. In J. Law and J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor Network and After (pp. 74-89).Oxford: Blackwell Publishers/The Sociological Review.
  • Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Mulcahy, D. (2007). Managing spaces: (re)working relations of strategy and spatiality in vocational education and training. Studies in Continuing Education, 29(2), 143-162. doi: 10.1080/01580370701403266
  • Mulcahy, D. (2010). Assembling the accomplished teacher: the performativity and politics of professional teaching standards, Educational Philosophy and Theory. Advance online publication. Doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00617.x
  • Mutch, A. (2003). Communities of practice and habitus: a critique. Organization Studies, 24(3), 383-395. doi: 10.1177/0170840603024003909
  • Nafukho, F.M., Hairston, N.R. & Brooks, K. (2004). Human capital theory: Implications for Human Resource Development. Human Resource Development International, 7(4), 545-551. doi: 10.1080/1367886042000299843
  • Nerland, M. (2010). Transnational discourses of knowledge and learning in professional work: Examples from computer engineering. Studies of Philosophy in Education, 29, 183-196. doi: 10.1007/s11217-009-9170-2
  • Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion: Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
  • Nespor, J. (2002). Networks and contexts of reform. Journal of Educational Change, 3(3-4), 365-382. doi: :10.1023/A:1021281913741
  • Olesen, H. S. (2001). Professional identity as learning processes in life histories. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(7-8), 290-298. doi: 10.1108/13665620110411076
  • Olesen, H. S. (2007). Theorising learning in life history: A psychosocietal approach. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(1), 38-53.
  • Poell, R. F. & Van der Krogt, F.J. (2003). Learning strategies of workers in the knowledge-creating company. Human Resources Development International, 6(3), 387-403. doi: 10.1080/13678860210136080
  • Popkewitz, T. & Brennan, B. (Eds.). (1998). Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Reedy, R. (2003). Together we stand? An investigation into the concept of solidarity in management education. Management Learning, 34(1), 91-110. doi: 10.1177/1350507603034001132
  • Samra-Fredericks, D. (2003). A proposal for developing a critical pedagogy in management from researching organizational members’ everyday practice. Management Learning, 34(3), 291-301. doi: 10.1177/13505076030343001
  • Sawchuk, P. H. (2006). Activity and power. In P. Sawhcuk, N. Duarte, & M. Elhammoumi (Eds.), Critical perspectives on activity: Explorations across education, work and everyday Life (pp. 238-268). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511509568.013
  • Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1-14). London: Routledge.
  • Snell, R. S. (2002). The learning organization, sensegiving and psychological contracts: A Hong Kong case. Organization Studies, 23(4), 549-565. doi: 10.1177/0170840602234003
  • Stewart, J., Rigg, C. & Trehan, K. (2007). Critical human resource development: Beyond Orthodoxy. Harlow: Pearson Education.
  • Straka, G. A. (2000). Conditions promoting self-directed learning at the workplace. Human Resources Development International, 3(2), 241-251. doi: 10.1080/136788600402708
  • Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions, (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Svensson, L., Ellström, P.-E. & Aberg C. (2004). Integrating formal and informal learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(7/8), 479-492. doi: 10.1108/13665620410566441
  • Swan, J., Scarbrough, H. & Robertson, M. (2002). The construction of ’communities of practice’ in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477-497. doi: 10.1177/1350507602334005
  • Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511576362
  • Tikkanen, T. (2002). Learning at work in technology intensive environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14(3), 89-98. doi: 10.1108/13665620210421902
  • Unwin, L., Felstead, A., Fuller, A., Bishop, D., Lee, T., Jewson, N. & Butler, P. (2007). Looking inside the Russian doll: the interconnections between context, learning and pedagogy in the workplace. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 15(3), 333-348. doi: 0.1080/14681360701602232
  • Usher, R. & Edwards, R. (2007). Lifelong Learning – Signs, discourses, practices. Netherlands: Springer.
  • Verran, H. (2001). Science and an African Logic. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246. doi: 10.1177/135050840072002
  • West, L. (2004). Doctors on the edge: General practitioners, health, and learning in the inner city. London: Free Association Books.
  • Wiethoff, C. (2004). Motivation to learn and diversity training: Application of the theory of planned behavior. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(3), 263-278. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1103
  • Wood, M. & Ferlie, E. (2003). Journeying from Hippocrates with Bergson and Deleuze. Organization Studies, 24(1), 47-64. doi: 10.1177/0170840603024001680

Volume 1, Issue: 1-2, Article 6, 2010

Author:
Tara Fenwick
Title:
Workplace ’learning’ and adult education: Messy objects, blurry maps and making difference
DOI:
10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0006
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
  • Andreas Feje & Erik Nylander (2015). How pluralistic is the research field on adult education? : Dominating bibliometrical trends, 2005-2012. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 6(2): 103. DOI: 10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9063
  • Bonnie Slade (2013). Professional learning in rural practice: a sociomaterial analysis. Journal of Workplace Learning, 25(2): 114. DOI: 10.1108/13665621311299799
  • Roy Canning (2013). Rethinking generic skills. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 4(2): 129. DOI: 10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9012
  • Ally R. Memo & Tony Kinder (2016). Management in New Public Service Systems: Reframing the Position of Managers and Their Training and Development. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(4): 270. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2015.1015551
  • Reinhard Zürcher (2015). A sociomaterial model of the teaching-learning continuum. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 6(1): 73. DOI: 10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0139
  • Kerry Harman (2014). The multiple reals of workplace learning. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 5(1): 51. DOI: 10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9021
  • Kerry Harman (2016). Examining work-education intersections: the production of learning reals in and through practice. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 7(1): 89. DOI: 10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0162
  • Henriette Lundgren, April Bang, Sean B. Justice, Victoria J. Marsick, Rob F. Poell, Lyle Yorks, Molly Clar & SeoYoon Sung (2017). Conceptualizing reflection in experience-based workplace learning. Human Resource Development International, : 1. DOI: 10.1080/13678868.2017.1308717
  • Mathias DECUYPER & Maarten SIMONS (2016). Sobre el potencial crítico de los enfoques sociomateriales en educación. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 28(1): 25. DOI: 10.14201/teoredu20162812544
  • Maurice C. Taylor, David L. Trumpowe & Edward R. Purse (2015). The role of work-related learning in the identity transformation of Canadian workers with low literacy skills. International Review of Education, 61(6): 815. DOI: 10.1007/s11159-015-9526-5
  • Yngve Antonsen (2014). The downside of the Balanced Scorecard: A case study from Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(1): 40. DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2013.08.001
  • Ally R. Memo & Tony Kinder (2016). Changing management roles in the Scottish NHS: implications for management learning and development. Public Money & Management, 36(1): 47. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2016.1103418
  • Export in BibTex, RIS or text