The educational potential of social economy projects in the Himalayas: the case of Avani
V.P.J. Sambhavi: University of Leuven, Belgium Mieke Berghmans: University of Leuven, Belgium Joke Vandenabeele: University of Leuven, Belgium
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
No. of pages:
Publication type:

In this article we analyze the social economy projects of Avani – a Community Based Organization based in Himalayas and reflect on their potential for enabling a critical pedagogy of place. We use the concept of tactics in a spatial and educational sense to explore Avani’s projects as an intervention within the dominant place logic of capitalism that opens market opportunities and enables new experiences of living and being for hill communities. We argue that these experiences are educational since they invoke, what we want to call, the possibility to verify one’s equality and one’s ability to do something. Our study is based on an ethnographic case approach and combines literature review, staff interviews and documents of Avani along with sensitizing concepts to guide our analysis.

Keywords: Tactics; pedagogic subjectivation; critical pedagogy; community based organization, India

Volume 8, Issue: 2, Article 6, 2017

V.P.J. Sambhavi, Mieke Berghmans, Joke Vandenabeele
The educational potential of social economy projects in the Himalayas: the case of Avani:

Avani-Kumaon Avani-Kumaon. (n.d.).  Retrieved Dec 1, 2015 http://avani-kumaon.org/

Bahuguna, S. (1982). Let the Himalayan forests live. Science Today, 15, 41-46.

Ball, R. (2001). Individualism, Collectivism, and Economic Development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 573, 57-84. DOI: 10.1177/0002716201573001004

Banerjee-Guha, S. (2013). Accumulation and Dispossession: Contradictions of Growth and Development in Contemporary India. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 36(2), 165-179. doi: 10.1080/00856401.2013.804026

Berreman, G. D. (1989). Chipko: a movement to save the Himalayan environment and people. In C. Borden (Ed.), Contemporary Indian tradition: Voices on nature and the challenge of change (pp. 239-266). Washington D.C.: Smithsonian.

Bhatt, C. P. (1988). The Chipko movement: Strategies, achievements, and impacts. In M. K. Raha (Ed.), The Himalayan heritage (pp. 249-265). New Delhi: Gian Publishing House.

Blumer, H. (1954). What is Wrong with Social Theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3-10. DOI: 10.2307/2088165

de Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California press.

Defourny, J., Grønbjerg, K., Meijs, L., Nyssens, M., & Yamauchi, N. (2016). Voluntas Symposium: Comments on Salamon and Sokolowski’s Re-conceptualization of the Third Sector. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(4), 1546-1561. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-016-9743-y

Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2007). Defining social enterprise. In M. Nyssens (Ed.), Social enterprise: At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society (pp. 3-26). London: Routledge.

Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (Eds.). (1996). Beyond the Magic Bullet: NGO Performance and Accountability in the Post-cold War World. West Hartford: Kumarian press.

Follett, M. P. (1924). Creative experience. New York: Longman, Green & Co.

Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (1993). This fissured land: an ecological history of India. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (1995). Ecology and equity: the use and abuse of nature in contemporary India. London: Routledge.

Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2014). Rethinking the Economy with Thick Description and Weak Theory. Current Anthropology, 55(S9), 147-153. DOI: 10.1086/676646

Gibson-Graham, J. K., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. (2013). Take Back the Economy: An Ethical Guide for Transforming Our Communities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/minnesota/9780816676064.001.0001

Guha, R. (2000). The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance in the Himalaya. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Gupta, S. (2015). Forest sustainability and development in hills of Uttarakhand, India: Can they move together? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18(1), 279-294. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-015-9648-8

Harvey, D. (1993). From space to place and back again. In J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam & L. Tickner (Eds.), Mapping the futures: Local cultures, global change (pp. 3-29). London: Routledge.

Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jayal, N. G. (2000). Same Wine, Same Bottle, New Lable? Economic and Political Weekly, 35(49), 4311-4314. doi: 10.2307/4410028

Lindeman, E. C. (1989). The Meaning of Adult Education. A Classic North American Statement on Adult Education. New York: New Republic.

Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2013). In defense of the school: a public issue. (J. McMartin, Trans.): Culture & Society Publishers, Leuven.

Mehta, G. (1999). Development of Uttarakhand: Issues and Perspectives. New Delhi: APH Publishing.

Mittal, S., Tripathi, G., & Sethi, D. (2008). Development strategy for the hill districts of Uttarakhand: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.

Moulaert, F., & Ailenei, O. (2005). Social economy, third sector and solidarity relations: A conceptual synthesis from history to present. Urban studies, 42(11), 2037-2053. DOI: 10.1080/00420980500279794

Negi, C. S. (2010). Traditional Culture and Biodiversity Conservation: Examples From Uttarakhand, Central Himalaya. Mountain Research and Development, 30(3), 259-265. DOI: 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-09-00040.1

Quarter, J. (1992). Canadas Social Economy: Co-opeartives, Non-profits, and Other Community Enterprises. Toronto: James Lorimer & Company.

Randeria, S. (2007). The State of Globalization Legal Plurality, Overlapping Sovereignties and Ambiguous Alliances between Civil Society and the Cunning State in India. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(1), 1-33. DOI: 10.1177/0263276407071559

Rangan, H. (2004). From Chipko to Uttaranchal. In Richard Peet & M. Watts (Eds.), Liberation ecologies: Environment, development, social movements (2nd ed., pp. 205-226). London: Routledge.

Ratner, C. (2009). Cooperativism: A Social, Economic, and Political Alternative to Capitalism. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 20(2), 44-73. DOI: 10.1080/10455750902941086

Shiva, V., & Bandyopadhyay, J. (1986). Chipko: Indias civilisational response to the forest crisis. New Delhi: Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage.

Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2010). Governmental, political and pedagogic subjectivation: Foucault with Rancière. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(5-6), 588-605. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00687.x

Vlieghe, J. (2014). Alphabetization as Emancipatory Practice: Freire, Rancière, and Critical Pedagogy. Philosophy of Education Archive, 185-193.

Williams, G., & Mawdsley, E. (2006). Postcolonial environmental justice: Government and governance in India. Geoforum, 37(5), 660-670. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.08.003

Volume 8, Issue: 2, Article 6, 2017

V.P.J. Sambhavi, Mieke Berghmans, Joke Vandenabeele
The educational potential of social economy projects in the Himalayas: the case of Avani:
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
No citations available at the moment
Export in BibTex, RIS or text